Xref: utzoo comp.sys.apple:5237 comp.sys.ibm.pc:14223 comp.windows.misc:441 Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!tektronix!upvax!stevewa From: stevewa@upvax.UUCP (Steve Ward) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple,comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.windows.misc Subject: Re: Apple Lawsuit (was BOYCOTT APPLE, etc.) Message-ID: <394@upvax.UUCP> Date: 7 Apr 88 20:52:56 GMT References: <292@unicom.UUCP> <663@csm9a.UUCP> <4283@dandelion.CI.COM> <13520@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU> <453@xroads.UUCP> Reply-To: stevewa@upvax.UUCP (Steve Ward) Organization: University of Portland, Portland, OR Lines: 53 Keywords: Microsoft, HP New Wave, Xerox, Lawsuit Summary: users lose out... In article <453@xroads.UUCP> tgm@xroads.UUCP (Sloan Tash) writes: >Wouldn't that just be a shame (if Apple won..). The other companies would >have >to come up with their own ideas. Given that Apple did take the concept from >Xerox, they developed it far beyond anything Xerox did. If the other >companies >want to take the same ideas that Apple started with, I don't think there >would >be a problem.. It's that they want to take Apple's ideas straight across. I disagree with your stand on a couple of points... 1. Usually it's good that individual companies come up with alternative solutions to a given "problem", but when you're trying to set up a STANDARD it's not such a good idea. Remember what happened about 12 years ago with VCRs? Two different companies came up with two different solutions to the same problem, namely VHS and Betamax. The result? several years of confusion for consumers, and a division of the market into two segments which, while basically the same, were cut off from each other by the difference in size of a cassette. Software (video tape) developers ended up spending twice as much to get their product out to the entire market, and companies not only had to compete against each other on product merit, but also on format superiority. Japan, Inc has learned its lesson, that's why they all get together and standardize things (8mm video, Digital audio cassette, etc) before they get onto the market. I don't think anyone wants to see the Beta/VHS war become the Apple/HP/ Microsoft/IBM/Commodore/Atari/etc. war. Such a conflict can only divide and distract the industry. Software developers would be stuck having to completely re-write applications for each environment they want to market to. No, a standard of some sort is needed. 2. I, for one, think MS-Windows is BETTER than the Mac OS in several ways. There are more ways to do things than on the Mac (usually two ways with the mouse, one with the keyboard), It has better keyboard support, I can buy whatever kind of pointing device I like and it will work, I can change the colors of the windows and what their borders look like, I can tell it what programs I want running at power-up, etc. etc. You see...Microsoft DID improve upon Apple's "creation" (I've never seen New Wave except for the ad in a magazine, and it didn't really look that much like a Mac to me, so I can't speak to that issue). With a standardized user interface, everyone wins. Users can move from machine to machine without having to re-learn, developers can port their applications from machine to machine more easily, manufacturers can concentrate on making their machines better instead of trying to sell you on why their OS is better than someone else's. I don't see how anyone benefits from NOT having a standard. Steve Ward stevewa@upvax.UUCP !tektronix!upvax!stevewa