Xref: utzoo news.groups:3190 news.admin:1900 soc.singles:15249
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!pyramid!decwrl!reid
From: reid@decwrl.dec.com (Brian Reid)
Newsgroups: news.groups,news.admin,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Final action on soc.sex
Message-ID: <350@bacchus.DEC.COM>
Date: 4 Apr 88 05:31:24 GMT
References: <3720@medusa.cs.purdue.edu>
Reply-To: reid@decwrl.UUCP (Brian Reid)
Organization: DEC Western Research
Lines: 12

In article <3720@medusa.cs.purdue.edu> spaf@cs.purdue.EDU (Gene Spafford) writes:
>...
>Therefore, I will not list soc.sex as a group in the list of active
>groups.  That list is intended to reflect groups with wide-spread
>propagation and support -- a soc.sex group would not qualify.  If
>somebody else decides to create the group, I will not "rmgroup" it
> ....

I have created the newsgroup alt.sex.
That caused us to have both alt.sex and alt.drugs.
It was then clearly necessary to have alt.rock-n-roll, so I created that too.

Cut loose.