Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga:17081 comp.sys.atari.st:8792 comp.sys.ibm.pc:13989 comp.sys.mac:14681 sci.electronics:2671 comp.arch:4202 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att-cb!att-ih!pacbell!ames!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!athena.mit.edu!peter From: peter@athena.mit.edu (Peter J Desnoyers) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,comp.sys.atari.st,comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.sys.mac,sci.electronics,comp.arch Subject: Re: Protectionism Message-ID: <4285@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU> Date: 3 Apr 88 12:21:38 GMT References: <2441@unicus.UUCP> <1259@hubcap.UUCP> <1641@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu> <1519@dataio.Data-IO.COM> Sender: daemon@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU Reply-To: peter@athena.mit.edu (Peter J Desnoyers) Followup-To: comp.misc Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lines: 40 In article <1519@dataio.Data-IO.COM> bright@dataio.UUCP (Walter Bright) writes: >Most economists today agree that one of the major causes of the Great ^^^^ Yeah. One of them. Milton Friedman. (sarcasm) > >The causes of the Depression were: >1. Comprehensive new protectionist laws. >2. Large tax increases. >3. The Federal Reserve System failed to allow interest rates to rise, and > failed to make more money available to banks (which directly resulted > in bank failures). >4. The stock market crash was not in itself responsible (just look at last > October's crash, where's the new Great Depression?). > I hate to argue such a pointless thing, but the error is so obvious and widespread. The Great Depression was NOT merely caused by forces acting within the boundaries of the U.S. Otherwise it might have stayed there. It was a world-wide depression. What about other factors: 1. Farm capacity in Europe that had been knocked out in WWI, and replaced by the U.S., Canada, Australia (or something like that) had just recovered, leading to a glut of many farm products 2. All sorts of linked debt and reparations payments. 3. Transition from London to New York as the chief financial market of the world. Tons of other things. A protectionist tariff on chips probably won't bring on another depression, but it will hurt all our board makers, and there are a lot more of them than there are chip makers. Instead of DAMAGING everyone else through tariffs, why doesn't the government ever try HELPING the companies that are not doing well? Things like government-coordinated planning, R&D, and other things which are standard in the military field, but unknown in civilian life. (Outside of Japan, Germany, ...) Peter Desnoyers peter@athena.mit.edu