Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cca!mirror!rayssd!raybed2!linus!mbunix!bwk
From: bwk@mitre-bedford.ARPA (Barry W. Kort)
Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech
Subject: Re: Reducible and irreducible sentences.
Message-ID: <28426@linus.UUCP>
Date: 5 Apr 88 17:56:12 GMT
References: <8224@agate.BERKELEY> <26505@cca> <8307@agate.BERKELEY> <26593@cca>
Sender: news@linus.UUCP
Reply-To: bwk@mbunix (Kort)
Organization: The MITRE Corporation, Bedford, Mass.
Lines: 8
Keywords: Buy the Book.
Summary: I suspect there is no way out of the loop except to jump.


Concerning Richard Harter's reducible/irreducible sentences,
don't we fall into the vortex with stuff like:

	1. The following sentence is reducible.
	2. The preceding sentence is irreducible.

--Barry Kort