Xref: utzoo talk.origins:1216 sci.philosophy.tech:601
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!actnyc!gcf
From: gcf@actnyc.UUCP (Gordon Fitch)
Newsgroups: talk.origins,sci.philosophy.tech
Subject: Re: Atoms (was Re: Mercury's day and other mysteries)
Message-ID: <772@actnyc.UUCP>
Date: 6 Apr 88 14:55:30 GMT
References: <26193@cca.CCA.COM> <8087@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <1149@3comvax.3Com.Com> <6212@watdragon.waterloo.edu>
Reply-To: gcf@actnyc.UUCP (Gordon Fitch)
Organization: InterACT Corporation
Lines: 9

In article <6212@watdragon.waterloo.edu> rmpinchback@dahlia.waterloo.edu (Reid M. Pinchback) writes:
}                                                    ....  Funny thing is
}that the "unexpectedness" of some discoveries is itself is a strong argument
}for the objective stance.  If you create what you see, why would you ever
}see something you didn't expect to see?
 
I create the entirety of the programs I write, all out of conscious
thought.  Yet the output of these programs is often something I didn't
expect to see.