Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!ucbvax!TAURUS.BITNET!shani
From: shani@TAURUS.BITNET
Newsgroups: comp.ai
Subject: Re: Free Will & Self-Awareness
Message-ID: <718@taurus.BITNET>
Date: 1 May 88 06:50:41 GMT
References: <4134@super.upenn.edu> <3200014@uiucdcsm> <1484@pt.cs.cmu.edu>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: <shani%TAURUS.BITNET@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>
Organization: Tel-Aviv Univesity Math and CS school, Israel
Lines: 9

In article <912@cresswell.quintus.UUCP>, ok@quintus.BITNET writes:

> compatible with strong determinism.  (The ones I've seen are riddled with
> logical errors, but most philosophical arguments I've seen are.)

That is correct, but there are few which arn't and that is mainly because
they mannaged to avoid self-contradictions and mixing of concepts...

O.S.