Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!ll-xn!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!EOVUOV11.BITNET!CMSBE1
From: CMSBE1@EOVUOV11.BITNET
Newsgroups: comp.ai.digest
Subject: S.E. VS. K.E.: bad focussed title, I think...
Message-ID: <8804301047.AA21615@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 28 Apr 88 13:06:01 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 23
Approved: ailist@kl.sri.com

Date: 28 April 1988, 09:02:38 EDT
From: Juan Francisco Suarez Vicente  (KIKO)          CMSBE1   at EOVUOV11
To:   AILIST at SRI

Hello !!!
I've received few answers about "Software Eng. VS. Knowledge Eng.", and
I'm agree with you. The problem I'd submitted to AILIST was because
a few months ago was presented in Spain a Conference with this title,
and my opinion was (and still follows being ) against this viewpoint.
Spain is an absolute beginner country in AI and K.E. subjects and,
how I suposse ocurred in other countries,some people tried to demonstrate
that AI techniques and K.E. techniques are "pure invention" and they
preferred attack AI than auto-critize their own methods.
My personal opinion: I'm agree with K.E. methodologies, and I'd like
give "good performance" reasons to its detractors, to demonstrate
them that Knowledge Engineering is not a "pure invention"...it's real
and very useful !!!!
And also I think that K.E. and Soft. Eng. can survive in a perfect
symbiosis.Cause of this,"VERSUS" isn't an appropiate word to relate them.
There are some conectives more suitables: WITH, AND, etc...
Do you think the same?
                   Kiko   (CMSBE1@EOVUOV11)   SPAIN
P.S.: Ahh...thank you too for answers about O-O techniques...