Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!umd5!uvaarpa!mcnc!decvax!decwrl!labrea!polya!kaufman
From: kaufman@polya.STANFORD.EDU (Marc T. Kaufman)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: hayes 9600 vs. trailblazer
Message-ID: <2629@polya.STANFORD.EDU>
Date: 17 Apr 88 17:41:54 GMT
References: <8804132344.AA25064@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> <17@stanton.TCC.COM>
Reply-To: kaufman@polya.stanford.edu (Marc T. Kaufman)
Organization: Stanford University
Lines: 16

In article <17@stanton.TCC.COM> donegan@stanton.TCC.COM (Steven P. Donegan) writes:

-When being quoted, I would appreciate a note regarding the origin. On another
-note; QUALITY V.32 modems, in my experience, denotes modems manufactured by
-RACAL MILGO, CODEX, ANDERSON JACOBSON and other equally HIGH QUALITY
-manufacturers. I will probably get flamed for this, but UDS (Motorola) and
-Cermatek are not (again real-life experience with MANY modems) as well
-built, reliable (as in MTBF) or robust (as in line noise handling capability)
-as the above mentioned modems.

Well, I have to tell you that CODEX and UDS are BOTH owned by Motorola, and
share the same internal circuits.

I was not aware that either Anderson Jacobson or Cermetek built V.32 modems.
There are several others that use the Rockwell chip set, under various names.

Marc Kaufman (kaufman@polya.stanford.edu)