Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!umd5!purdue!decwrl!ucbvax!ADS.COM!jordan
From: jordan@ADS.COM (Jordan Hayes)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Sprint billing not all bad?
Message-ID: <8804192323.AA01302@zooks.ads.com>
Date: 19 Apr 88 23:23:24 GMT
References: <8804182341.AA29431@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: Advanced Decision Systems, Mt. View, CA (415) 960-7300
Lines: 12
Approved: telecom@xx.lcs.mit.edu


	"One very large company uses US Sprint BECAUSE of these
	problems. It says that the bills arrive anywhere from one to
	six months late, giving them a nice cash cushion, and usually
	come with less than 70% of the calls they know they made."

Well, the party's over.  I did this as well, and in this month's
Pacific Bell bill, I received a bill from Sprint for the last 6 months
worth of calls ... a small note at the bottom said "We hope this isn't
an inconvienience" ... grrr ... so much for any scratch money I had
budgeted for this month ...

/jordan