Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bbn!mit-eddie!ll-xn!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!decwrl!labrea!orphan!conor
From: conor@orphan.UUCP (Conor S. Rafferty)
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Subject: Background GnuLisp Procedures
Message-ID: <3@orphan.UUCP>
Date: 15 Apr 88 20:34:17 GMT
References: <4569@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU>
Distribution: comp.emacs
Lines: 4
Keywords: Lisp backgound
Summary: I wish
Expires:

Sender:

Reply-To:

Followup-To:


Wouldn't background lisp processes require multiple lisp processes,
a scheduler etc?  Reminds me of a quote I first heard from Smalltalk
people:
"An operating system is everything you left out of the language".