Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!mordor!sri-spam!ames!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!mtunx!whuts!homxb!antique!cjp
From: cjp@antique.UUCP (Charles Poirier)
Newsgroups: comp.graphics
Subject: Re: polygon enclosing point
Message-ID: <2191@antique.UUCP>
Date: 20 Apr 88 17:03:35 GMT
References: <615@ubu.warwick.UUCP> <6196@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu>
Reply-To: cjp@vax135.UUCP (Charles Poirier)
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel, NJ
Lines: 13
Summary: yes, again

In article <6196@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> flaig@cit-vlsi.UUCP (Charles M. Flaig) writes:
>Whimper....  I assume you don't follow this group regularly if you are asking
>this question.  It has been covered *repeatedly* and is well past the satura-
>tion point.  Does your site really flush old articles that quickly?

Hey man, wanna chill out?  Some sites really do have to flush articles
two weeks old.  Since the recurrence period of the point-inside-polygon
question is a good three weeks, ... you get the picture.  Grin and bear
it.  Reply to such questions by email if possible.

-- 
	Charles Poirier   (decvax,ihnp4,attmail)!vax135!cjp

   "Docking complete...       Docking complete...       Docking complete..."