Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!labrea!agate!pasteur!ames!pacbell!att-ih!ihnp4!ihlpf!nevin1 From: nevin1@ihlpf.ATT.COM (00704a-Liber) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: gotos Message-ID: <4442@ihlpf.ATT.COM> Date: 15 Apr 88 22:50:24 GMT References: <1988Apr8.183815.3187@utzoo.uucp> <449@goofy.megatest.UUCP> <1988Apr11.201934.20594@utzoo.uucp> <2575@ttrdc.UUCP> <2581@geac.UUCP> Reply-To: nevin1@ihlpf.UUCP (00704a-Liber,N.J.) Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories - Naperville, Illinois Lines: 12 In article <2581@geac.UUCP> daveb@geac.UUCP (David Collier-Brown) writes: > I like the $50.00 scheme, actually, although I do use gotos[1]. >I figure it (the $50.00) is a good example of making engineering >tradeoffs explicit. I don't like the scheme, because I would rather find a way around using GOTO than pay the $50. -- _ __ NEVIN J. LIBER ..!ihnp4!ihlpf!nevin1 (312) 510-6194 ' ) ) "The secret compartment of my ring I fill / / _ , __o ____ with an Underdog super-energy pill." / (_