Path: utzoo!yunexus!geac!daveb
From: daveb@geac.UUCP (David Collier-Brown)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Put your code where your mouth is (was Re: gotos)
Summary: How about "by inspection"?
Message-ID: <2645@geac.UUCP>
Date: 25 Apr 88 12:46:52 GMT
Article-I.D.: geac.2645
Posted: Mon Apr 25 08:46:52 1988
References: <1988Apr11.201934.20594@utzoo.uucp> <451@goofy.megatest.UUCP> <1988Apr20.072000.384@utzoo.uucp> <2595@ttrdc.UUCP>
Reply-To: daveb@geac.UUCP (David Collier-Brown)
Organization: The Geac Jaundiced Eye Department.
Lines: 23


>In article <1988Apr20.072000.384@utzoo.uucp>, henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) writes:
># To put it bluntly, it's not worth my time.  In most cases the obvious goto-
># free code is just as efficient as Knuth's, given a modern compiler.  Much
># of what Knuth is discussing can be seen as ways of hand-coding the sort
># of optimizations that modern compilers do without being asked.

In article <2595@ttrdc.UUCP> levy@ttrdc.UUCP (Daniel R. Levy) writes:
>Nice show of arrogance but any reasonable reader must conclude that you have
>not proved your case.  You somehow found plenty of time to rail against gotos.

    Well, I can't always claim to be reasonable, but I'll claim
Henry is right.  When I read the Knuth paper, I wondered if the real
subject was optimizing compilers... I sorta recollect I saw at least
one thing that PL/1 would do automagically.
    I will also claim to be a reader...

--dave c-b
-- 
 David Collier-Brown.                 {mnetor yunexus utgpu}!geac!daveb
 Geac Computers International Inc.,   |  Computer Science loses its
 350 Steelcase Road,Markham, Ontario, |  memory (if not its mind) 
 CANADA, L3R 1B3 (416) 475-0525 x3279 |  every 6 months.