Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!ucsd!chem.ucsd.edu!tps
From: tps@chem.ucsd.edu (Tom Stockfisch)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: problem with -f flag in lex?
Message-ID: <196@chem.ucsd.EDU>
Date: 29 Apr 88 06:09:59 GMT
References: <255@stc-auts.UUCP>
Reply-To: tps@chem.ucsd.edu (Tom Stockfisch)
Distribution: na
Organization: Chemistry Dept, UC San Diego
Lines: 16
Keywords: lex

In article <255@stc-auts.UUCP> kak@stc-auts.UUCP (Kris Kugel) writes:
>
>On the suggestion of a fellow netter, I tried recompiling some
>lex code using the -f flag (no table compression) to see if I 
>could speed it up some.

As I understand it, this is supposed to make lex create the lex.yy.c
file faster, at the expense of making the lex.yy.c file bigger.
Given that "cc lex.yy.c" takes an order of magnitude longer than
"lex lex.l", I don't know why anyone would want to use this flag.
Perhaps that's why no one has noticed till now that it doesn't work:

>But when I tried to run it, it started dumping core.
>	Kris A. Kugel
-- 

|| Tom Stockfisch, UCSD Chemistry	tps@chem.ucsd.edu