Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!amdahl!amdcad!tim From: tim@amdcad.AMD.COM (Tim Olson) Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: Loops Message-ID: <21187@amdcad.AMD.COM> Date: 16 Apr 88 02:31:40 GMT References: <2827@enea.se> <1557@pasteur.Berkeley.Edu> <2773@mmintl.UUCP> <294@tmsoft.UUCP> <2797@mmintl.UUCP> <340@aiva.ed.ac.uk> Reply-To: tim@amdcad.UUCP (Tim Olson) Organization: Advanced Micro Devices Lines: 22 In article <340@aiva.ed.ac.uk> richard@uk.ac.ed.aiva (Richard Tobin) writes: |In article jk3k+@andrew.cmu.edu (Joe Keane) writes: |>While i'm at childish flaming, i might as well say that i _really_ hate `fi', |>`rof', `esac', and `elihw'. Can anyone say they're a good idea and keep a |>straight face? | |Yeah, I think they're great, especially 'tnemmoc' and 'nigeb'. Reminds me of a paper I was just re-reading: "Design of a LISP-Based Microprocessor" by Steele et al. It contains a pseudocode listing of a state machine, which uses two constructs, "if" and "type-dispatch". The last state is: RETURN: TYPE-DISPATCH ON CLINK INTO "IF2": GOTO IF2 "EVCOM3": GOTO EVCOM3 HCTAPSID-EPYT !SESOL ARTSKJID -- Tim Olson Advanced Micro Devices (tim@amdcad.amd.com)