Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!quintus!ok
From: ok@quintus.UUCP (Richard A. O'Keefe)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog
Subject: Re: BSI Prolog terms of reference
Message-ID: <896@cresswell.quintus.UUCP>
Date: 25 Apr 88 05:10:48 GMT
References: <256@gould.doc.ic.ac.uk> <6960004@hpfclp.SDE.HP.COM> <1194@its63b.ed.ac.uk>
Organization: Quintus Computer Systems, Mountain View, CA
Lines: 12

In article <1194@its63b.ed.ac.uk>, jha@its63b.ed.ac.uk (J Andrews) writes:
>                         This Is Usenet.
> 
>      For all I know about Richard O'Keefe (which is less than I
> should, judging by all the excellent things I see about him and by
> him), he is a first-rate computer scientist from whom I could learn
> a lot.  But that doesn't mean that I (or others) have to put up with
> long, irritating articles from him on this anarchic, user-run public
> network.  We don't do that on comp.lang.c, or soc.women, or
> talk.bizarre even, so why should we do it on comp.lang.prolog?

Because I don't post to soc.women or talk.bizarre (:-).