Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!mcvax!ukc!eagle!icdoc!ivax!cdsm
From: cdsm@ivax.doc.ic.ac.uk (Chris Moss)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog
Subject: Re: BSI Prolog terms of reference
Message-ID: <271@gould.doc.ic.ac.uk>
Date: 27 Apr 88 17:28:08 GMT
References: <256@gould.doc.ic.ac.uk> <6960004@hpfclp.SDE.HP.COM> <1194@its63b.ed.ac.uk>
Sender: news@doc.ic.ac.uk
Reply-To: cdsm@doc.ic.ac.uk (Chris Moss)
Organization: Dept. of Computing, Imperial College, London, UK.
Lines: 23

In article <1194@its63b.ed.ac.uk> jha@lfcs.ed.ac.uk (J Andrews) writes:
>In article <6960004@hpfclp.SDE.HP.COM> fritz@hpfclp.SDE.HP.COM (Gary Fritz) writes:
> [on Chris Moss's comments about Richard O'Keefe]
>>... I would hope you could look past
>>his writing style and consider the issues he raises.  The responsibilities of
>>your position on a standard-creating committee demand it.

I can't respond to Gary  as his (and possibly several other) letters
never reached us here (I've been rather busy and might have missed one).
But my comments about Richard were encased in "flame" and ":-)" marks
which had been removed in one message I saw. That ain't netiquette!

In case there is misunderstanding: I know full well Richard is a New 
Zealander; I appreciate his style and (often) his humour; and I think
he probably understands mine. So no aggro. If my humour is off the
line please let me know. Face-to-face communication is difficult
enough goodness knows; across continents, heaven help us!

And as I've said before: if I'm representing the line of a committee
I'll say so; otherwise I'm speaking for myself as one member among
many.

Chris Moss.