Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!uwvax!dogie!uwmcsd1!ig!agate!ucbvax!CS.YALE.EDU!fleishman-glenn
From: fleishman-glenn@CS.YALE.EDU (Glenn Fleishman)
Newsgroups: comp.laser-printers
Subject: Re: Cartridge variation in Canon printers?
Message-ID: <8804251524.AA03653@brillig.umd.edu>
Date: 16 Apr 88 16:51:34 GMT
References: <8804051954.AA16236@brillig.umd.edu> <8804151840.AA28062@brillig.umd.edu>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: fleishman-glenn@cs.yale.edu (Glenn Fleishman)
Organization: Yale University Computer Science Dept, New Haven CT  06520-2158
Lines: 13
Approved: laser-lovers@brillig.umd.edu


In article <8804151840.AA28062@brillig.umd.edu> P364@QZCOM.BITNET ("Bo Thide Swedish Institute of Space Physics") writes:
>This is quite common.  We have had our LJ+ for a few years and
>replaced maybe 15 ccartridges.  You always get thinner (and in
>my opinion better-looking) lines the first 100 pages or so.
This is odd, because the LJ+ I work with in one place I consult at doesn't
produce good type until after about 20 or 30 copies with a new cartridge.
The type is passible, but not the highest quality that one can get
out of the LJ+. Is this just our machine, or does it vary that
much?
Glenn I. Fleishman, graphic designer & Mac apologist
FLEGLEI@YALEVM.BITNET or to above address
"What? Why did you say that? What do you know about my IMAGE DUPLICATOR?"