Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!pacbell!varian!zehntel!zinfandel.zehntel.com!donw From: donw@zinfandel.zehntel.com (Don White) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re:The A3000 Message-ID: <565@zehntel.UUCP> Date: 26 Apr 88 19:43:27 GMT Sender: usenet@zehntel.UUCP Reply-To: donw@zinfandel.zehntel.com (Don White) Lines: 36 In article <8018@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> flaig@cit-clsi.Caltech.Edu (Charles M. Flaig ) writes: >In article <3467@gryphon.CTS.COM> richard@gryphon.CTS.COM (Richard Sexton) writes: >>In article <549@zehntel.UUCP> donw@beaujolais (Don White) writes: >>> >>> Wouldn't it be nice if ALL the current Amy NTSC graphics modes were kept >>> as a SUBSET of the overall graphics capability? That way, it would still >>> be THE desktop video machine, AND it could service those Hi Res-ophiles! >>> (1000x800 grin, or 2000x2000 grin grin, or 1Meg x 1Meg grin of wooly >>> mammoth proportions) >> >>The problem is, sport, that monitors in this range cost more than >>a used porsche. > >You know, I never could understand why people want such high resolution color >monitors. The *ONLY* valid application I can see for them is CAD, and very >few people need to do this at home. And I think workstations should have I'm sorry for the lack of obvious smileys. I guess no one got it! Doesn't the 2000 have a VIDEO SLOT? Wasn't the purpose of this slot to make the super exceptional (and yes, Richard, EXPENSIVE) hi-res graphics OPTIONAL?!?!?! When (and if) it came out, you could get a reletively inexpensive monitor and just do NTSC, OR you get get a plug-in and a more costly monitor and blaze. I guess the bottom line here is.. Do we need an Amy 3000? I don't think we've scratched the surface of the 2000. Every feature I have heard of for the 3000 COULD BE an expansion for the 2000! It feels to me like commodore is running from one peice of new hardware to another like a kid in a candy store. How can the hardware mature in that kind of environment? P.S. Richard, you seem awful familiar. Do I remember you from somewhere? (Besides here of course.)