Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!mcvax!enea!kuling!jonasf
From: jonasf@kuling.UUCP (Jonas Flygare)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Maximum array size in Lattice 4.0
Message-ID: <695@kuling.UUCP>
Date: 18 Apr 88 07:46:03 GMT
References: <49386@sun.uucp>
Organization: Dep. of Computer Systems, Upsala University, Sweden
Lines: 22

From article <49386@sun.uucp>, by cmcmanis%pepper@Sun.COM (Chuck McManis):
> In article <692@kuling.UUCP> jonasf@kuling.UUCP (Jonas Flygare) writes:
[Voluminous question deleted]
> 
[Description of how to solve my problem]
> Read the manual under the section 'compiler features' or some such for
> a description of these issues.
I thought I did that. Unfortunately I was looking at the pages on LC, not
LC1.. There it says: "-b	This option *causes* the compiler to use
a base-relative (...) instead of a 32-bit absolute address"
(Note "causes"..) Now, I will award a bag of virtual peanuts to the first
person who guesses what I assumed about LC's default mode... ;-) 


> --Chuck McManis
> uucp: {anywhere}!sun!cmcmanis   BIX: cmcmanis  ARPAnet: cmcmanis@sun.com
> These opinions are my own and no one elses, but you knew that didn't you.
-- 
Jonas Flygare (aka Flax)         +------------------------------------------+
email: jonasf@kuling.UUCP        | "Never try to hack while a playful ferret |
real:  Vaktargatan 32 F:621      |  is watching your toes.                  |
       S-754 22 Uppsala Sweden   +-------- I TRIED....... OUCH! ------------+