Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!pasteur!agate!eris!doug
From: doug@eris (Doug Merritt)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: Fixing flicker, & future frame rate issues
Message-ID: <8963@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: 19 Apr 88 23:50:22 GMT
References: <3655@cbmvax.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@agate.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: doug@eris.UUCP (Doug Merritt)
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 23
Keywords: Point- Counterpoint

In article <3655@cbmvax.UUCP> hedley@cbmvax.UUCP (Hedley Davis) writes:
>We are working on newer better stuff. Your comments, however flamed,
>will naturally enter into our list of considerations for futures.

That's nice to hear!
And, given the flame level, more than I would have expected.
Thanks!

[ my comments about an improved fF deleted ]
>Yes this could have been done. It would have required twice the ram,

Good point. How about a design that allows you to populate either
just the basic memory, or twice as much for the improvement?

As to the comment (deleted for brevity) about it being too bad that
this didn't come up while you guys were still in the design stage,
well, that *is* unfortunate. Maybe you could think of some way of
discussing possible design tradeoffs on the net, without compromising
company security and like policies? Perhaps by having some developer
you trust bring it up for discussion, without it being Official Commodore
Design Business?
	Doug Merritt		doug@mica.berkeley.edu (ucbvax!mica!doug)
			or	ucbvax!unisoft!certes!doug
			or	sun.com!cup.portal.com!doug-merritt