Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!pasteur!agate!ig!uwmcsd1!marque!gryphon!richard
From: richard@gryphon.CTS.COM (Richard Sexton)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: film grain vs. pixels
Message-ID: <3543@gryphon.CTS.COM>
Date: 24 Apr 88 06:40:13 GMT
References: <3346@gryphon.CTS.COM> <9102@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Reply-To: richard@gryphon.CTS.COM (Richard Sexton)
Organization: Trailing Edge Technology, Redondo Beach, CA
Lines: 20

In article <9102@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> doug@eris.UUCP (Doug Merritt) writes:
>In article <3346@gryphon.CTS.COM> richard@gryphon.CTS.COM (Richard Sexton) writes:
>:I used to work for a company that did work with color film recorders
>:and it was generally accepted that Ektachrome 64 ASA film max'd out
>:at about 5000 dpi.
>
>Ok. So what's the implied comment???
>

The implied comment, Doug, is those socks dont go with that shirt 
you're wearing.

The explicit comment was somebody said film didn't have pixels, it
was continuous. It's not. I merely quantified it. Perhaps thats not what
was being said, but that's what came across.



-- 
         "They spent all night staring down at the lights of L.A." heh 
richard@gryphon.CTS.COM                          rutgers!marque!gryphon!richard