Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!lll-tis!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!decwrl!pyramid!octopus!avsd!govett
From: govett@avsd.UUCP (David Govett)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Wanted: reports on Concurrent DOS
Message-ID: <117@avsd.UUCP>
Date: 21 Apr 88 16:47:09 GMT
References: <3371@tekgvs.TEK.COM>
Distribution: na
Organization: Ampex Advanced Technology Division, Redwood City, CA
Lines: 11

> I've got Windows/386. It's OK; I need to do some serious RTFM to
> understand what I'm doing vs. what it wants me to do...
> 
> But I wonder why (Digital Research's?) Concurrent DOS doesn't get
> more of an audience. Has anyone "out there" tried it? I'm tempted to
> get a copy and evaluate it unless I get some real seriou hate mail
> about it. Let me know what your experience has been...
> 

Concurrent DOS works fine.  Try Desqview, too.  DRI's Concurrent DOS
has always been better than Windows, but DRI couldn't market eternal
life profitably.