Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!ncar!oddjob!sphinx!pre1
From: pre1@sphinx.uchicago.edu (Grant Prellwitz)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: DAK's Packard Bell AT Compatible
Message-ID: <4071@sphinx.uchicago.edu>
Date: 23 Apr 88 04:52:51 GMT
References: <414@termnl.Cambridge.NCR.COM>
Reply-To: pre1@sphinx.uchicago.edu.UUCP (Grant Prellwitz)
Organization: U Chicago Computation Center
Lines: 26
Summary: Packard Bell == Samsung

In article <414@termnl.Cambridge.NCR.COM> hartman@termnl.Cambridge.NCR.COM (Alan Hartman) writes:
>In there latest catalog, DAK has an AT-clone advertised for $1999, which
>includes and EGA monitor and a 40 Meg hard disk.  The brand name for the
>computer is Packard Bell 10Mhz AT.  Does anyone have any first hand
>knowledge as to how well this machine performs?
>Any and all information would be appreciated?
>Thanks,
>- Alan -

I once had a representative try to have me carry the Packard Bell line of 
computers and monitors.  At that time (about 7 mos. ago), Packard Bell 
computers and monitors were made by Samsung.  I wasn't too interested in 
carrying a new line at the time so I didn't persue it past that.  This means
that I can't tell you any more about it, but the question is now more general:
What can anyone say about either Packard Bell OR Samsung computers.



Hope this helps,
Grant Prellwitz
Prellwitz Computing Services

-- 
=====================Grant Prellwitz==========================
!ihnp4!gargoyle!sphinx!pre1          pre1@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP 
76474,2121 (CIS)                                    pre1 (BIX)  
!ihnp4!chinet!pre1    contents sole responsibility of poster.