Xref: utzoo comp.lang.c:9551 comp.sys.ibm.pc:14778
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!umd5!purdue!decwrl!pyramid!prls!philabs!micomvax!ray
From: ray@micomvax.UUCP (Ray Dunn)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: cdecl keyword
Message-ID: <994@micomvax.UUCP>
Date: 22 Apr 88 02:03:23 GMT
References: <many> <7606@brl-smoke.ARPA> <982@micomvax.UUCP> <7682@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Reply-To: ray@micomvax.UUCP (Ray Dunn)
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: Philips Electronics Ltd. (TDS - Montreal) St. Laurent QC, Canada
Lines: 28

In article <7682@brl-smoke.ARPA> (Doug Gwyn) writes:
>In article <982@micomvax.UUCP> ray@micomvax.UUCP (Ray Dunn) writes:
>>What do you suggest as an alternative?  To put the onus on the *other*
>>languages?  Sure, that is possible, but who says 'C' has to be the reference
>>language?
>
>Your entire response shows that you missed what I was saying.
>

Your entire response shows that you missed what I was saying.

Your pointed (:-) reply does not quote my posting which it is supposed to be
rebutting, I presume because most of the points in it are not rebutted.

>Point 4: My home computer uses a scheme exactly as I have described; it
>	even has a segmented architecture.  Don't accuse me of lack of
>	experience!

Tch.  Tch.  Doug.  Now we are in fantasy land.  This is a fine example of
going off at half cock, as in the recent "goto's" fiasco.

I will pay a handsome reward to the first person who can point out any
accusation of lack of *experience* in my posting.

I wonder what an analyst of Freudian bent would make of all of this?

Followups, perhaps, to alt.flame.

Ray Dunn.  ..{philabs, mnetor}!micomvax!ray