Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!bloom-beacon!spdcc!eli
From: eli@spdcc.COM (Steve Elias)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Wanted: reports on Concurrent DOS
Message-ID: <943@spdcc.COM>
Date: 23 Apr 88 14:03:11 GMT
References: <3371@tekgvs.TEK.COM> <117@avsd.UUCP>
Reply-To: eli@spdcc.COM (Steve Elias)
Distribution: na
Organization: Un M. Ployed, Inc.
Lines: 12

In article <117@avsd.UUCP> govett@avsd.UUCP (David Govett) writes:

>Concurrent DOS works fine.  Try Desqview, too.  DRI's Concurrent DOS
>has always been better than Windows, but DRI couldn't market eternal
>life profitably.

	quite true!!  one thing to be aware of is that DRI CDOS is
	the *only* real multitasking system for the PC which is 
	DOS compatible.  by real, i mean:  preemptive multitasking &
	priority driven scheduler...  

	i used to be an OEM for DRI, and am familiar with the internals
	of the versions up to 5.1...  (they're at 6.0, now).