Xref: utzoo comp.text:1846 comp.sys.ibm.pc:15048
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!hplabs!hp-pcd!uoregon!omepd!pcm
From: pcm@iwarpv.intel.com (Phil C. Miller)
Newsgroups: comp.text,comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: CTeX and DOS or XENIX or Microport
Message-ID: <3422@omepd>
Date: 28 Apr 88 19:57:47 GMT
References: <377@mancol.UUCP> <7314@dhw68k.cts.com>
Sender: news@omepd
Reply-To: pcm@iwarpv.UUCP (Phil C. Miller)
Organization: Intel Corp., Hillsboro
Lines: 24
Keywords: Common TeX 2.9, PC-DOS

In article <7314@dhw68k.cts.com> phil@dhw68k.cts.com (Phil Suematsu) writes:
>In article <377@mancol.UUCP> samperi@mancol.UUCP (Dominick Samperi) writes:
>>I've been trying to get CTeX 2.9 running under DOS or Xenix or Microport.

Great, I have been wondering recently if such a thing exists, mostly
since starting a job where the predominant text processor is LATeX.

>I assume you are working with Common TeX 2.9, and not CTeX (CTeX is 
>not Common TeX).

Wow, there's more than one!

>I don't want to release diffs to the net quite yet, because I have
>not had the opportunity to fully test the modified Common TeX.

Diffs?  Where does one get the original source code?

>It is possible that someone out there
>has a Common TeX 2.9 working under MS-DOS which has already been
>torture tested.  It would be better to post diffs from that source
>rather than from my untested version.

If it doesn't cause a lawsuit or an apoplectic fit from Unix SysAdmins,
could someone post the source or at least some information about how
to obtain Common TeX?