Xref: utzoo comp.unix.questions:6603 comp.unix.wizards:7832
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att-cb!att-ih!pacbell!ames!umd5!uvaarpa!mcnc!decvax!mandrill!hal!ncoast!allbery
From: allbery@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon Allbery)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions,comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: RFS vs. NFS
Message-ID: <7609@ncoast.UUCP>
Date: 15 Apr 88 22:31:22 GMT
References: <4566@megaron.arizona.edu> <465@cimcor.UUCP>
Reply-To: allbery@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon Allbery)
Followup-To: comp.unix.questions
Distribution: na
Organization: Cleveland Public Access UN*X, Cleveland, Oh
Lines: 22

As quoted from <465@cimcor.UUCP> by mike@cimcor.UUCP (Michael Grenier):
+---------------
| From article <4566@megaron.arizona.edu>, by lm@arizona.edu (Larry McVoy):
| > In article <10186@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com> ekrell@hector (Eduardo Krell) writes:
| >>And AT&T is not trying to lock you into AT&T products by pushing RFS;
| >>there are a lot of non AT&T boxes running System V Release 3 and RFS.
| > 
| > Truth in advertising, please.  How about a list of those boxes?  Maybe 
| > people will see the light and start to take RFS seriously?
| 
| OK, how about any 80386 box running a port of Interactive's Unix which
| includes Interactive, Microport, Bell Technologies, etc. This includes
+---------------

Also Altos System V, which leans rather closer to Xenix than to Interactive's
386 port; not to mention their Unix for the 3068 (68020 box).  I also
understand that Plexus (680x0 boxes) is dropping its proprietary NOS and
going RFS in its V.3 port (if and when it comes out, unless you bought a P/95
which has it now).
-- 
	      Brandon S. Allbery, moderator of comp.sources.misc
       {well!hoptoad,uunet!hnsurg3,cbosgd,sun!mandrill}!ncoast!allbery