Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!ncar!boulder!sunybcs!rutgers!gauss.rutgers.edu!aramis.rutgers.edu!porthos.rutgers.edu!gaynor
From: gaynor@porthos.rutgers.edu (Silver)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc
Subject: Re: The Lawsuit, Standardization, and Whiny MAC Users...
Message-ID: <Apr.22.02.39.39.1988.2482@porthos.rutgers.edu>
Date: 22 Apr 88 06:39:41 GMT
References: <8685@eleazar.Dartmouth.EDU> <8911@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <1866@sugar.UUCP>
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 12

peter@sugar.UUCP (Peter da Silva) writes:
|In article <8911@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>, mwm@eris.UUCP writes:
|> Note that a lot of the people upset about the lawsuit are people who
|> wouldn't touch an IBM PC for love or money. Some have even been
|> (falsly) accused of being anti-8086 bigots in public.
|
| I'll stand up for my own anti-8086 bigotry for myself, thanks. There's
| nothing wrong with discriminating against processors that are genuinely
| inferior.

What is `IBM'? `8086'?

Regards, [Ag]