Xref: utzoo sci.electronics:2876 comp.sys.ibm.pc:15014
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!brl-adm!umd5!cgs
From: cgs@umd5.umd.edu (Chris Sylvain)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics,comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: PSPICE Demo (Explanation for the curious)
Message-ID: <2644@umd5.umd.edu>
Date: 28 Apr 88 15:19:39 GMT
References: <2622@umd5.umd.edu> <5595@sgistl.SGI.COM>
Reply-To: cgs@umd5 (Chris Sylvain)
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Lines: 38
Keywords: Useful, limited

In article <5595@sgistl.SGI.COM> larry@sgistl.SGI.COM (Larry Autry) writes:
>In article <2622@umd5.umd.edu>, cgs@umd5.umd.edu (Chris Sylvain) writes:
>< 
>< The Demo I posted is actually *USEFUL*, albeit limited. It doesn't just
>< spit pleasant looking graphics at you.
>< 
>< For the casual circuit analysis (you're limited to 10 transistors, so I
>< guess that means a passive circuit of no more than 30-40 nodes --
>
>Ten transistors?  Great! Thats not only useless, but ridiculous.  Please
>dont' post crap like that ... [blah, blah, woof, woof]
>larry@sgistl.sgi.com

I hope the net will please 'scuse me, but I feel I must respond to this
insult in order to maintain a "stress-free" [NBC] existence.

Read no further, if your wont is not to see flame.



Hey, smartman! So tell me then, how many transistors were in the recently
discussed RIAA filter, huh ?!!

Look, I suppose analysis of a Chebyschev filter is beneath you or
something, right ? You don't analyze on or two transistor circuits
anymore 'cause they're "trivial" or rather not stimulating enough to
your most discriminating sensibilities!!!

Stay off my CRT, smartman! 



(Honest, my .signature program picks these at random, really it does!)
-- 
--==---==---==--
.. the Jabberwock, with eyes of flame, ..
   ARPA: cgs@umd5.UMD.EDU     BITNET: cgs%umd5@umd2
   UUCP: ..!uunet!umd5.umd.edu!cgs