Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!iscuva!carlp From: carlp@iscuva.ISCS.COM (Carl Paukstis) Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d Subject: Re: ZOO/ARC Discussion Message-ID: <1456@iscuva.ISCS.COM> Date: 4 May 88 19:39:52 GMT References: <827@uvm-gen.UUCP> <21371@amdcad.AMD.COM> <25745@clyde.ATT.COM> Organization: ISC Systems Corporation, Spokane, WA Lines: 37 Keywords: Zoo Arc In article <25745@clyde.ATT.COM> feg@clyde.ATT.COM (Forrest Gehrke) writes: >In article <21371@amdcad.AMD.COM>, phil@amdcad.AMD.COM (Phil Ngai) writes: > >> My understanding is that zoo can handle directories and arc can't. If >> that is true, it would seem zoo is preferable. > >Will someone please explain why any archiver's ability to >handle directories is important for transmitting binaries >on USENET? Ahem. The ORIGINAL note, to which Mr. Ngai's note replied was, if I remember correctly, asking for advice about which archiver to use for setting up one's own shareware/PD library. However, much of the same reasoning should apply. The directory capability makes it easy to PACKAGE program environments, not single binaries. I'm belaboring the obvious point when I say that many useful binaries require several support files for configuration, option setup, etc. With really useful software getting ever more complex, it is desirable to organize a PACKAGE into a main directory and one or more subdirectories, to minimize the number of uninformative file names the end-user need see when in the PACKAGE directory. This is not to say that a hierarchy-maintaining archiver is VITAL (one can always provide INSTALL.BAT files to do the dirty work), only that is preferable to use one if it is available. On the issue of Usenet transmission, I am of two minds. On the one hand, I have acquired several VERY useful PC-type things this way, and I'd hate to give it up. On the other hand, I sympathize with those who pay the transmission costs (I don't) and would rather not transmit/receive large chunks of stuff. -- Carl Paukstis +1 509 927 5600 x5321 |"I met a girl who sang the blues | and asked her for some happy news UUCP: carlp@iscuvc.ISCS.COM | but she just smiled and turned away" ...uunet!iscuva!iscuvc!carlp | - Don MacLean