Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!ll-xn!ames!amdcad!phil
From: phil@amdcad.AMD.COM (Phil Ngai)
Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d
Subject: Re: ZOO/ARC Discussion
Message-ID: <21414@amdcad.AMD.COM>
Date: 4 May 88 17:51:49 GMT
References: <827@uvm-gen.UUCP> <10681@steinmetz.ge.com>
Reply-To: phil@amdcad.UUCP (Phil Ngai)
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices
Lines: 12
Keywords: Zoo Arc

In article <10681@steinmetz.ge.com> davidsen@crdos1.UUCP (bill davidsen) writes:
.  There are two major reasons why people want to use zoo over arc;
.(a) features such as comments and subdirectories, and (b) performance,
.since zoo is 5-8 times faster than arc *in UNIX*. Neither of these are
.compelling reasons, and I think the choice should be left to the poster

Subdirectories unimportant? I suggest you've been using PCs too long.
-- 
Make Japan the 51st state!

I speak for myself, not the company.
Phil Ngai, {ucbvax,decwrl,allegra}!amdcad!phil or phil@amd.com