Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!GARP.MIT.EDU!henry
From: henry@GARP.MIT.EDU (Henry Mensch)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Is there a path from BITNET to Compuserve?
Message-ID: <8805030337.AA05873@garp.mit.edu>
Date: 3 May 88 03:37:07 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: henry@GARP.MIT.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 13
Approved: telecom@xx.lcs.mit.edu


   From: mdf@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu (Mark D. Freeman)
   Date: 30 Apr 88 19:44:37 GMT

   So, there is no link between CompuServe and BITNET.  It seems to me
   like the problem keeping that link from being created is insoluble.  If
   you have any ideas on ways around the billing problem, I'd like to hear
   it.

Yeah; they could simply NOT CHARGE FOR IT (y'know, include it as a
SERVICE).  Of course, this is probably too much to expect.  

# Henry Mensch  /  <henry@garp.mit.edu>  /  E40-379 MIT,  Cambridge, MA
# {ames,cca,decvax,harvard,lotus,mit-eddie,rochester,soft21}!garp!henry