Xref: utzoo comp.protocols.tcp-ip:3385 comp.os.vms:5912 comp.protocols.misc:262 comp.protocols.appletalk:614
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!cbmvax!vu-vlsi!swatsun!jeremy
From: jeremy@swatsun.uucp (Jeremy Brest)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip,comp.os.vms,comp.protocols.misc,comp.protocols.appletalk
Subject: Any experiences w/ DECnet in a multi-vendor environment?
Message-ID: <1780@carthage.UUCP>
Date: 3 May 88 18:39:58 GMT
Reply-To: jeremy@swatsun.UUCP (Jeremy Brest)
Organization: Swarthmore College, Swarthmore PA
Lines: 35
Keywords: DECnet, TCP-IP

I'm interested in any experiences that anyone has had with trying to
use DECnet as the central protocol in a multi-vendor network
environment.  How well (i.e., transparently) do the following work?

	1) remote login to local sites?
	
	2) remote login to wide area TCP-IP networks?

	3) file transfer between local sites?

	4) file transfer (anonymous FTP) over wide area TCP-IP
	networks?

	5) local mail?

	6) mail through wide area networks, including uucp, bitnet,
	wide area TCP-IP networks, and CSNet?

Other concerns are how Macintoshes and MS-DOS machines fit into the
picture.  I know that with TCP-IP, software has been developed to
provide login and file transfer, as well as sever implementations of
mail systems.  What about with DECnet?  

I'm also interested in how might a heterogenious network work out,
that is, have a few machines that spoke both TCP-IP and DECnet, but
most machines speaking one or the other.

Thanks,

Jeremy Brest
Swarthmore College

uucp:      ...seismo!bpa!swatsun!jeremy
CSnet:     jeremy@swatsun.swarthmore.edu
Internet:  jeremy%swatsun.swarthmore.edu@relay.cs.net