Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!gatech!sbmsg1!scbhq!ll1a!spl1!laidbak!daveb From: daveb@laidbak.UUCP (Dave Burton) Newsgroups: comp.sys.tandy Subject: 3.2 Devl. Sys (was Re: uucico brain-damaged?) Message-ID: <1419@laidbak.UUCP> Date: 25 Apr 88 03:37:29 GMT References: <284@spies.UUCP> <755@devon.UUCP> Reply-To: daveb@laidbak.UUCP (Dave Burton) Distribution: na Organization: is pretty bad/My method of Lines: 27 Keywords: 3.2 develop In article <755@devon.UUCP> paul@devon.UUCP (Paul Sutcliffe Jr.) writes: >In article <284@spies.UUCP> ameyer@spies.UUCP (Andy Meyer) writes: >> Ah yes. The -x debug option is also non-functional. >Tandy is aware that the -x option is broken. It is corrected in the >(soon to be released) 3.2 development system, although the uucp is >*still* the V7 one (from the original Xenix 2.3). 3.2DS was Real Soon Now last year. When *will* 3.2 hit the streets? When Tandy has its annual new product announcements? This is a bit silly. I have 'heard' of the 3.2DS for the past several months. It is also referred to in the 3.2Core man pages. I would really appreciate any info regarding when Real Soon Now is. Yes, I _have_ checked the local Business Products Centers. No, they have no idea what 3.2 Xenix is. If no dates are known (or Tandy won't talk), then maybe whet my appetite by posting some the goodies 3.2DS will provide. An sdb maybe? A compiler (and lint) that understands void? A preprocessor that has more than 8 sig- nificant characters? A ctags that knows about typedefs? A _real_ inittabs? Disk partitions? ... -- --------------------"Well, it looked good when I wrote it"--------------------- Verbal: Dave Burton Net: ...!ihnp4!laidbak!daveb V-MAIL: (312) 505-9100 x325 USSnail: 1901 N. Naper Blvd. #include Naperville, IL 60540