Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!gatech!udel!princeton!phoenix!amlovell
From: amlovell@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Anthony M Lovell)
Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d
Subject: What is going on here?
Keywords: is this why we needed a moderator?
Message-ID: <2875@phoenix.Princeton.EDU>
Date: 13 May 88 16:33:47 GMT
Organization: Princeton University, NJ
Lines: 13

Are we witnessing the advantage of having this binaries group moderated?
The move was meant to reduce the discussion of binaries and promote the
proliferation of executables.  Instead, the opposite has occurred.  The
only activity is the discussion of non-existent binaries.

Why must things be this way?  It is FAR inferior to the old arrangement.
Is there something I'm missing?  Clue me in if I am!

-- 
amlovell@phoenix.princeton.edu     ...since 1963.

disclaimer:
These are MY opinions.  You only WISH they were yours.