Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!think!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!ucsd!hub!gauss!mwette
From: mwette@gauss.ucsb.edu (Matt Wette)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: access functions
Message-ID: <624@hub.ucsb.edu>
Date: 16 May 88 22:40:52 GMT
References: <11152@mimsy.UUCP> <6590046@hplsla.HP.COM> <1027@unmvax.unm.edu>
Sender: news@hub.ucsb.edu
Reply-To: mwette@gauss.UUCP (Matt Wette)
Organization: University of California, Santa Barbara
Lines: 33

In article <1027@unmvax.unm.edu> mike@turing.UNM.EDU.UUCP (Michael I. Bushnell) writes:
>
>Nothing, obviously.  This code is better written as
>struct IntVal
>{
> public:
>    value;
>};
>Get the picture?  If you think that you really NEED access functions,
>you might as well just make it a struct.
>                N u m q u a m   G l o r i a   D e o 
>			Michael I. Bushnell



What about ...

class IntVal {
	int val;
public:
	int value() { return val; }
	void value(int aval) { val = aval; }
};


Matt Wette
 _____________________________________________________________________________
 Matthew R. Wette			| ARPA: mwette%gauss@hub.ucsb.edu
 Scientific Computation Lab		| UUCP: ucbvax!ucsbhub!gauss!mwette
 Dept. Elec. and Comp. Eng.		|
 University of California		|
 Santa Barbara, CA  93106		|
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------