Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!think!ames!lll-lcc!well!ewhac
From: ewhac@well.UUCP (Leo 'Bols Ewhac' Schwab)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: A Modest Proposal (IFF QuickDraw)
Summary: What a dweeb!
Message-ID: <5979@well.UUCP>
Date: 17 May 88 06:41:55 GMT
References: <1760@van-bc.UUCP> <5967@well.UUCP>
Reply-To: ewhac@well.UUCP (Leo 'Bols Ewhac' Schwab)
Organization: The Comic Relief Machine
Lines: 25

In article <5967@well.UUCP> ewhac@well.UUCP (Leo 'Bols Ewhac' Schwab) writes:
>	"PostScript:  The Inefficient Document Layout Specification Language
>for The Masses.  Yes, PostScript is just the thing for you "power-users" with
>disk space, transfer bandwidth, and money just begging to be needlessly
>consumed.  Why be efficient or clever, when you can have PostScript?"
>
> [ obvious line noise deleted ]

	This moron obviously hasn't read the specs for NAPLPS *or*
PostScript, so what gives him the right to say one is better than the other.
I won't even dignify your "concrete minuses" for PostScript by refuting
them.

	If you want to comment on structured graphics, then kindly read the
specification for the standard you're supporting or refuting.  Otherwise,
you're just spouting drivel.

	Personally, I think you should stick to demos and animations, since
that's all you seem to be qualified for...

>_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
>Leo L. Schwab -- The Guy in The Cape  ihnp4!pacbell -\
> \_ -_		Recumbent Bikes:	      dual ---> !{well,unicom}!ewhac
>O----^o      The Only Way To Fly.	      hplabs / (pronounced "AE-wack")
>"Work FOR?  I don't work FOR anybody!  I'm just having fun."  -- The Doctor