Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!snll-arpagw!paolucci
From: paolucci@snll-arpagw.UUCP (Sam Paolucci)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Amiga Tex, redux
Keywords: AmigaTeX, wonderful
Message-ID: <163@snll-arpagw.UUCP>
Date: 17 May 88 02:50:07 GMT
References: <23631@bbn.COM> <249@b11.UUCP> <796@ur-cvsvax.UUCP> <493@sas.UUCP> <671@thalia.rice.edu> <523@osupyr.mast.ohio-state.edu>
Reply-To: paolucci@snll-arpagw.UUCP (Sam Paolucci)
Organization: Sandia National Labs, Livermore
Lines: 27

In article <523@osupyr.mast.ohio-state.edu> vkr@osupyr.mast.ohio-state.edu (Vidhyanath K. Rao) writes:
>I concur with all the good things said about AmigaTeX and would like to add
>that the support from Tom has been better than support for any other software
>I own.
>
>In article <671@thalia.rice.edu>, phil@titan.rice.edu (William LeFebvre) writes:
>> Something very important that you left out of that list:  BibTeX.
>                                                            ^^^^^^
>Is there any hope a BibTeX that will work with AMSTeX? I got to have AMSTeX
>for my papers.
>Does anybody know of spelling checkers that will eat TeX source? I was going
>to hack MicroSpell (Fish 101) but would rather not reinvent the wheel. The
>catch is that of course, it should not cry wolf at $MU_*(\Omega_0SO(n))$.

I'm working on porting a program that will remove all TeX specific commands.
The resulting file should be clean enough to be passed through any 
spellchecker.  I'll post it when I finish it.

>
> Disclaimer, disclaimer, etc.  I'm just a satisfied customer, etc.

					-+= SAM =+-


"the best things in life are free"


				ARPA: paolucci@snll-arpagw.llnl.gov