Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!USU.BITNET!SLMYQ
From: SLMYQ@USU.BITNET
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Macro languages
Message-ID: <8805180018.AA13980@jade.berkeley.edu>
Date: 18 May 88 00:16:00 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Lines: 14

>>Glad to hear it.  However, as I hear, AREXX is commercial.  We need
>>a PD version...
>
>**** Pull control Rods, NUCLEAR BURNER START ...

I wasn't going to respond to this message on Usenet, but I see we might
have some flame wars coming ahead if I don't.

Basically the problem is AREXX is probably much bigger and more complex
than I thought - I haven't seen it, so I couldn't say.  Anyway, I had
the idea that it was just another 20K utility that went commercial.  If
I had known it was big enough to generate a nuclear disaster, I would've
kept my mouth shut.  Sorry, just a misunderstanding on my part.

                                Bryan Ford (SLMYQ@USU.BITNET)