Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!ll-xn!mit-eddie!bloom-beacon!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!osupyr.mast.ohio-state.edu!vkr
From: vkr@osupyr.mast.ohio-state.edu (Vidhyanath K. Rao)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Macro languages
Summary: Two questions (bugs?) about AREXX
Message-ID: <530@osupyr.mast.ohio-state.edu>
Date: 19 May 88 15:18:52 GMT
References: <8805180018.AA13980@jade.berkeley.edu> <3816@cbmvax.UUCP>
Organization: Ohio State Math-Stats Dept
Lines: 11

My previous posting on this didn't get an answer and so the repost:
Why does a macro processor want 'ieeedoubbas.library'. My boot disks are
so full that I have to scrounge around for one or two free blocks. I guess
what I really need is a whole bunch of PATH commands one each for l:, libs:
etc.
Next, why does the 'ADDRESS COMMAND wait' look for c:wait instead of all the
right places? (like sys:system) [Yes the path add occurs before rexx is
installed. In fact none of the rexx commands are in c:. I prefer to keep
only the commands to move to ram in c: and I don't want to assign because
I want ram:c to be FIRST in the search path] Is the fault in the library
[I use ARP] or in AREXX?
-Nath