Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!bellcore!faline!thumper!ulysses!andante!mit-eddie!bbn!rochester!udel!gatech!purdue!decwrl!ucbvax!agate!web4d.berkeley.edu!laba-4an
From: laba-4an@web4d.berkeley.edu.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple
Subject: Re: ][gs+ Info
Summary: Easy now...
Message-ID: <9911@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: 12 May 88 22:59:19 GMT
References: <8805120036.AA14444@crash.cts.com> <782@geowhiz.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@agate.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: laba-4an@web4d.berkeley.edu.UUCP (Andy McFadden)
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 23
Posted: Thu May 12 18:59:19 1988

In article <782@geowhiz.UUCP> scott@geowhiz.UUCP (Scott Kempf) writes:
>
>	Before we all get excited and start spreading rumors:
>
>		Can anyone verify this.
>
>	Apple still claims they are not working on a faster //gs.

Yes, let's get this story checked out... it sounded a bit like The Unknown
User on a bad drug trip :-)

I can believe that Apple would be going over to the Mac HFS system (the way
they worship that machine...).  It might be better that way (easy transfer
of files, FASTER DISK STARTUP TIMES, etc.), although I'm not sure what that
is going to do to a hard disk (talk to First Class Peripherals about an HFS
partition...)

Let's go to bed tonight with our fantasies calmly locked in place (but it
doesn't hurt to dream a little, does it?)

-- 
laba-4an@widow.berkeley.edu (Andy McFadden)
"No matter where you go, there you are."