Xref: utzoo news.groups:3882 comp.sys.cbm:1411
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!bbn!uwmcsd1!marque!dennisf
From: dennisf@marque.mu.edu (Dennis Flaherty)
Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.sys.cbm
Subject: Re: CPM and C-128
Message-ID: <143@marque.mu.edu>
Date: 20 May 88 14:59:40 GMT
References: <9255@eddie.MIT.EDU> <11577@mimsy.UUCP>
Reply-To: dennisf@marque.UUCP (Dennis Flaherty)
Distribution: na
Organization: Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI
Lines: 23

In article <11577@mimsy.UUCP> mangoe@mimsy.umd.edu.UUCP (Charley Wingate) writes:
} >>	As I said before, with the inclusion of C/PM on the C128 that
} >>has opened up more areas where Commodore users can get software
} >>support. So you cannot simply consider the programs written
} >>specifically for Commodore computers.
} 
} >Who actually uses the 128's CP/M mode?
me!
} 
} There is actually a fair amount of traffic in ~.cpm on the C128, and the
} simtel-20 archives do store programs for these machines.  I don't think
} there is a need to create a new group to handle this traffic.

I'll agree with you there-- we are supported by simtel-20/rpicicge for
C128's CPM mode.  There is no need for a usenet group for that.  But
what about C128 native mode and the C64, the proposal in question?

					Dennis
-- 
                                            Dennis Flaherty
dennisf%marque@csd1.milw.wisc.edu           Marquette University
3790FLAH@MUCSD.BITNET               USNail: 826 N. 20th St.
dennisf@marque.mu.edu                       Milwaukee, WI 53233