Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!gatech!purdue!i.cc.purdue.edu!j.cc.purdue.edu!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!uxe.cso.uiuc.edu!leonardr From: leonardr@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: New System icon Message-ID: <46100151@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu> Date: 17 May 88 14:09:00 GMT References: <340@dcc1.UUCP> Lines: 32 Nf-ID: #R:dcc1.UUCP:340:uxe.cso.uiuc.edu:46100151:000:1720 Nf-From: uxe.cso.uiuc.edu!leonardr May 17 09:09:00 1988 keith@uhccux.UUCP(Keith Kinoshita) writes in comp.sys.mac >In article <340@dcc1.UUCP> john@dcc1.UUCP (John Cothran) writes: >[stuff deleted] >> What about different icons on each machine (I realize that this could cause >>some problems for new users who wouldn't know wheather or not the System file >>that looked like an SE should be booted on a Plus or a II)? > > Why complicate the system both visually and as a matter of >programming simplicity for something as dubious as a visual representation for >hardware recognition? I thought the whole idea of the Mac environment was >to hide the hardware level, and make everything as simple as possible. > Come to think of it, Apple should have standardized a CDEV and >an INIT icon for the mac as well. Well, Apple has done something like ths in 6.0, but not with icons. In Finder 6.1 when viewing by name/date,etc any CDEV will be listed as a 'Control Panel Document' and any INIT will be wil listed as a 'Startup Document'. How's that?? +---------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ + + Any thing I say may be taken as + + Leonard Rosenthol + fact, then again you might decide+ + President, LazerWare, inc. + that it really isn't, so you + + + never know, do you?? + + leonardr@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu + + + GEnie: MACgician + + + Delphi: MACgician + + + + + +---------------------------------+-----------------------------------+