Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ibm.pc:15597 comp.sys.misc:1426
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wucs1!wuibc!sgistl!larry
From: larry@sgistl.SGI.COM (Larry Autry)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.sys.misc
Subject: Re: Are RLL details too technical?
Message-ID: <5624@sgistl.SGI.COM>
Date: 16 May 88 02:14:11 GMT
References: <1255@kodak.UUCP> <638@mccc.UUCP> <216@octopus.UUCP> <650@mccc.UUCP> <217@octopus.UUCP>
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc., Mt.View, CA., St.Louis Ofc.
Lines: 19

In article <217@octopus.UUCP>, pete@octopus.UUCP (Pete Holzmann) writes:
> I'm trying to figure out the level of technical content appropriate for
> this group.
> 
> Pete
>                      UUCP: {hpda,pyramid}!octopus!pete


The unix newsgroups are subdivided.  One for wizards and one for neophytes.
If the subject is somewhere in between levels of difficulty then the poster
has a decision to make where to post.  Perhaps this group should be divided
into comp.sys.ibm.pc and comp.sys.ibm.pc.tech.  Any agreement?  Any dissent?


-- 
					Larry Autry
larry@sgistl.sgi.com
       or
{ucbvax,sun,ames,pyramid,decwrl}!sgi!sgistl!larry