Xref: utzoo comp.unix.questions:7144 comp.unix.wizards:8653
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!bellcore!faline!thumper!ulysses!andante!princeton!udel!rochester!cornell!batcomputer!itsgw!steinmetz!uunet!vsi!sullivan
From: sullivan@vsi.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions,comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: functional stdio
Summary: Clones
Message-ID: <682@vsi.UUCP>
Date: 20 May 88 20:26:50 GMT
References: <136@insyte.uucp> <11331@mimsy.UUCP> <13597@comp.vuw.ac.nz> <11589@mimsy.UUCP>
Organization: V-Systems, Inc. -- Santa Ana, CA
Lines: 10
Posted: Fri May 20 16:26:50 1988


Does anybody else find it ironic that IBM doesn't want to be tied down
to a single vendor's standard, and to avoid that will make its
own clone of that standard?  Why is IBM expecting AT&T to act in a way
that IBM won't act regarding PS/2?

-- 
Michael Sullivan		{uunet|attmail}!vsi!sullivan
				sullivan@vsi.com
HE V MTL			Anybody out there remember Max Webster?