Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!uwvax!dogie!uwmcsd1!bbn!diamond.bbn.com!mlandau From: mlandau@bbn.com (Matt Landau) Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions Subject: Re: Splinter Unix? Keywords: unix, aix, system v, posix Message-ID: <11056@jade.BBN.COM> Date: 20 May 88 15:30:18 GMT References: <556@n8emr.UUCP> <1228@ssc.UUCP> Reply-To: mlandau@bbn.com (Matt Landau) Organization: BBN Laboratories Incorporated, Cambridge, MA Lines: 30 In comp.unix.questions (<1228@ssc.UUCP>), fyl@ssc.UUCP (Phil Hughes) writes: >The alternative, called Open Software Foundation involves a whole bunch of >vendors (about 9 so far) and they are doing joint development on the >standard and the code. The best thing that could happen is that AT&T and >Sun could say, "Ok, you win" and join in. Actually, this may be the worst thing that could happen. In some sort of Platonic Ideal world, the idea of completely equal input in design and implementation would be great. In the real world, however, there are numerous examples of what happens why you try design-by-committee, and it just doesn't seem to work very well. I cannot see how these 9 companies, historically competitors, each with its own private interests and agenda, are going to manage to prodcue anything reasonable in a realistic amount of time (especially given that AT&T has the entire existing body of System V and SunOS code to work from, while OSF seems like it has to start essentially from scratch to avoid the possibility of a lawsuit for copyright infringement.) It's really too bad that AT&T couldn't satisfy the Hamilton Group's desire for resonable licensing terms and equal *access* to (as opposed to equal *input* on) the SysVR4 work. Then they could have let AT&T and Sun do a good job on the core development and concentrated their own efforts on adding value for their particular machines and applications. Oh, well, it looks like we're gonna be stuck with the SysV versus 4BSD schism all over again. *Sigh* -- Matt Landau Let not a man glory in this: that he loves his country. mlandau@bbn.com Let him glory rather in this: that he loves his kind.