Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!uwvax!oddjob!ncar!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!ulysses!hector!ekrell
From: ekrell@hector.UUCP (Eduardo Krell)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: Should ``csh'' be part of the System V distribution?
Keywords: csh==Berkeley shell, should it be in System V or not?
Message-ID: <10295@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com>
Date: 17 May 88 12:29:50 GMT
References: <2599@usceast.UUCP> <2601@usceast.UUCP> <77@denali.stanford.edu> <1262@csun.UUCP>
Sender: netnews@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com
Reply-To: ekrell@hector (Eduardo Krell)
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Murray Hill
Lines: 12

In article <1262@csun.UUCP> sef@csun.UUCP (Sean Fagan) writes:

>I agree.  ksh is my shell of choice.  Anybody know how well it works on
>job-control systems?

Just as good as csh. We link ksh to /bin/sh in all our Vaxen and Suns
(running 4.3 BSD and SunOS), and a quick look at /etc/passwd finds 1
user who uses csh out of some 300.
    
    Eduardo Krell                   AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ

    UUCP: {ihnp4,ucbvax}!ulysses!ekrell		ARPA: ekrell@ulysses.att.com