Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!ll-xn!mit-eddie!bbn!bbn.com!rsalz
From: rsalz@bbn.com (Rich Salz)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: Should ``csh'' be part of the System V distribution?
Message-ID: <744@fig.bbn.com>
Date: 18 May 88 00:41:28 GMT
Followup-To: junk
Organization: BBN Laboratories Inc., Cambridge MA
Lines: 14

The answers seem to narrow down to:
    1.  Ksh is best
    2.  Csh is a crock
    3.  Csh is friendlier, and looks kinda like C
    4.  I want to do "this" in the XXXsh, how do I do it?
    5.  Sh is portable
    6.  On my system we have ### users of XXXsh, and only # users of XXXsh

Can we stop cluttering the net, now?

BTW, I would be interested in hearing anyone address the question
that was REALLY asked (go read the Subject line...)
	/rich $alz
-- 
Please send comp.sources.unix-related mail to rsalz@uunet.uu.net.