Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!ulysses!hector!ekrell
From: ekrell@hector.UUCP (Eduardo Krell)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: Should ``csh'' be part of the System V distribution?
Keywords: csh==Berkeley shell, should it be in System V or not?
Message-ID: <10297@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com>
Date: 18 May 88 23:42:27 GMT
References: <2599@usceast.UUCP> <2601@usceast.UUCP> <10857@steinmetz.ge.com> <762@ambush.UUCP>
Sender: netnews@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com
Reply-To: ekrell@hector (Eduardo Krell)
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Murray Hill
Lines: 13

In article <762@ambush.UUCP> kimcm@ambush.UUCP writes:

>Korn Shell:
>	- Inadequate automatical scripts (.kshrc, .profile)

Excuse me, but how is this "Inadequate"? If you mean the lack of a
.logout as in csh, how about

trap .logout 0

    
    Eduardo Krell                   AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ

    UUCP: {ihnp4,ucbvax}!ulysses!ekrell		ARPA: ekrell@ulysses.att.com